Wednesday, September 24, 2008
Mileage
I have experimented a little with another, cheaper design. I can say that it drew alot higher amps then the current booster in the same concentration of electrolite, but I do not know if it had higher output. I will be playing with it as I find time, I will also be looking into ways of keeping the unit from freezing, as we are heading into winter.
Overall good results. Everyone should have one!
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
Posting for posting sake
I am now in the stage of making the system a hassel free system that will only need looked at every 300-500 miles. A few obsticals in my way include the nagging heat problem on the terminals and keeping the water level of the cell at a constant level automatically. I may have already solved the heat problem with larger wires and it is possible that the PWM will help also. And i am currently working on an auto refiller that will simply work on negative pressure from teh cell cooling down.
Here is the circuit for the PWM

Saturday, August 9, 2008
Uploaded - Aug 9, 2008
Up until today I really haven't had too much to add to my progress. I took a much needed break from working on the unit. the booster continues to run too hot at the terminals and melts the lid of the booster. I am rebuilding my booster and will be using the old one until I have time to recunstruct the lid for the new unit. The picture is of a pulse width modifier. this device modifies the 12 v current going into the cell.I have also upgraded all my wires in my setup to double 12 guage twisted pairs. this should keep the amp draw down and keep the cell terminals cooler. a freind of mine built it from a schematic he found online. I will post the design when I get it.
I will be testing the pwm in the near future and hopefully have some results to post.
Saturday, July 19, 2008
New fixes
This allows for more connection and less resistance on the terminal is should eliminate the problem.
I continue to see improvements in my MPGs. On a mix of 44 highway and 68 city, I achieved , 33mpg, roughly 30% gains in mileage. I will consider this one of my last "official tests" as I am getting tired of keeping track of mileage. I will be installing 2 units on a cummins diesel truck in the next few weeks and will show my progress on here.
Saturday, July 12, 2008
Uploaded - Jul 12, 2008
Sunday, July 6, 2008
Continuing results
Thursday, July 3, 2008
Some unofficial results
I will be changing the way I fill up my car now. Full to the brim as far as possible should help and using the same pump when possible. I will also avoid filling up to early. The longer your run, the less a small amount of variable matters. I will be putting some heavy highway miles on this weekend and will post a "Highway only" reading for everyone. Then I will discipline myself to running close to a full tank through to get a mix highway/City reading. Keep in mind that I will not and have not changed my driving habits. These changes should give me more accurate readings. If technologies like this interest you, check this link. It is a collections of radio interviews from James Robey. He interviews many inventers, companies, etc. about their technologies. Including my favorite Bob Krupa and the Firestorm Spark Plug... http://www.blogtalkradio.com/search/water+fuel
Sunday, June 29, 2008
Back on track
The new cell also incorporates a bubbler (tube on the side with water in it) that keeps the gas from back firing into the engine. You can see the finished cell with bubbler here..
This unit achieves great production. I must say that the electrolyte (NaOH) makes all the difference in the world. When running just under 30 Amps, this unit produces very close to a liter per minute. I could have put a little more electrolyte to inch up production, but I would rather have it running reliably than pushing the limits on my fuse and relay. I decided to put my old cell into a new container (because of my crappy lid) and see how it compared in production with the new one. With the same PVC container I achieved exactly the same results as the new cell. I can only attribute this to the faulty lid on my old unit. It was leaking so much that it could not make enough pressure to bubble under water. This bubbler would not even have worked on my old design. Being air tight is very important to get the gas where it is supposed to go into the intake. So, Although my old unit is potentially working alot better in a new case, I will be running the new Cell in my car for the week to see if I can get better results.
Here you can see the bubbler churning away.
Here it is installed in the car.
Unfortunately this means we will have to wait and see if all the hard work will actually pay off in the end. I just replaced my distributor cap which can effect my mileage readings. I will have to drive a few days without the cell on to re-establish a base mpg average and then run with the new cell to confirm any gains. The production is now there, but is the result.
Sunday, June 22, 2008
No Progress
In other news, I will be attempting to build my own unit(S) in the coming weeks. I feel like I have seen enough of them and know enough about the process to try and construct my own that will put out better results.(over 1 li/min)
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
Frustration
Sunday, June 15, 2008
Faulty results
I am begining to think that the cell design I have is not the best and am considering building my own. The fact that I could barely get one liter/min really makes me want to work on a new unit that will put out some real results. Will post more results later.
Saturday, June 14, 2008
Some first results
Then I took a full tank on a highway journey of 90 miles (Exactly) and filled up to find I reached 31.6 MPG. This seemed good for my car, but once again i have never taken a highway only reading before. So the average between the two would be somewhere around 27MPG which could be considered a 10 percent gain, but not considered enough of a gain to me. I will be running through for a week to see what I get on a mix of highway/city.
I do think that my cell is not really a high production model like i have seen and I could use some sealing on the hose going into my intake. Stay tuned. Feel free to leave comments!(Please no names, places, or occurrences)
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Installation
I ran about 110 miles this weekend that were mostly highway. 50 miles were with the cell running. My results were 28.6 mpg. I will be running all city this week and get a reading before any highway driving. I will keep an eye on the unit to make sure it is still there and running every few days. So far, my check engine light has not come on; meaning my engine must be running lean and the EFIE must be working. Time will tell
Sunday, June 8, 2008
Second test day
Thursday, June 5, 2008
First Production HHO Hybrid

Sunday, June 1, 2008
First Tests
This weekend I was able to hook the unit up to power on a bench at the house. The directions specify using distilled water and a teaspoon of baking soda as an electrolyte in the solution.
I filled the unit first with regular tap water to see if it would make a difference. I attached a car battery charger that has 10, 20, and 50 amp settings running at 12 volts to the unit. It is stated in the directions that it should draw 30 amps from your vehicle. Running tap water did not give good results at all. There were few to no bubble coming from the unit and the water turned brownish after just a few minutes.
Second test- I measured out the baking soda (I have read that NaOH is better, but have none) and used the recommended distilled water. The second test yielded better results. I was quite surprised to see the difference that different water and a little baking soda can do. I started with the low amperage setting of 10 and not a whole lot happened. Switching it up to the higher amps produced much more gas, but it still did not seem like much.
In this picture you can see the bubbles of gas starting to rise off the plates.

The best results were with the charger set to 50 Amps.
Here is the cell after a few minutes of running at 50. The cloudiness is small gas bubbles that rise to the top and build pressure.

This picture actually looks like it is doing pretty well, but I wasn't too pumped at what I was seeing. This unit is supposed to be putting out 1liter/minute of gas and this is not near that amount. I decide to measure by using a liter jar underwater and pumping the gas into it while measuring time. While running at 50 Amps it took 4 minutes to produce 250ml. 16minutes /liter. This is not good for water full cell standards. I have seen units from 4-16 liters/minute on Youtube.
After letting it run, I decided to see how powerful this gas actually is. I started by lighting bubbles of gas as they came to the top of my test tank. They pop like firecrackers leaving a little flame. Then I was lighting the end of my tube that hooks directly into the cell. Getting a little haphazard, I thought the check valve was there for a reason! the flame went back through the tube and turned my cell into an H bomb. The Lid and cell flew out 5 feet in the air with a shot louder than a 9mm.
This is what my lid looked like after the explosion.

Luckily it didn't explode the glass and nothing was really wrecked. I will need to check the lid later for leaks.
You would think that higher voltage and higher amperage would give best results and they are better, but the best units put off huge amounts of gas at low amperage and adjusted voltage. The trick is to optimize the signal going into the cell for best results. I will need to do alot more research to find that setting and the equipment to produce it. I will also be researching different cells, as this one has a different setup than I have seen and did not do so well in first tests.

Thursday, May 29, 2008
CELL arrived
As you can see in the picture, everything is packed nice and secure
The Cell itself is very solid and well constructed. The stainless steel is heavy quality and no junk parts were used. The cell design is very interesting. I haven't seen any like it before online. Hopefully that is a good thing. So far I can say I am happy with the quality, but performance is what we are really looking for.
Overall i am pleased with the item. I will try to test the unit this weekend.
Testing will include trying different electrolytes in varying concentrations. I have not located any Sodium Hydroxide locally, so I may have to order online. I guess I will only be testing baking soda. input is the other variable that I will want to test when possible. I am sure better production results can be achieved by adjusting the signal going into the cell (google stanley meyer and his research). I will not be able to do much with that until I find a PWM that i think is not a sham.
Then again, this whole hype may be... we will see.
Monday, May 26, 2008
I say tricking" , because running the HHO will have your car running lean (burning gas more efficiently) and making your O2 sensors think the engine is starving for gas, when really its just working better. This is where the definitions i promised earlier come in.
THE EFIE- is the Electronic Fuel Injection Enhancer. It doesn't really enhance too much more than the voltage on the O2 sensor. While running, your car's o2 sensor will produce a variable voltage from 0 to 1 volt to your vehicle computer. When running lean, that voltage is lowered and will trip your check engine light in the car. (not good for mileage). The EFIE is attached above the o2 sensor and will add that extra voltage that keeps the car thinking it is running normal. Tuning comes in to play here. Each cars voltage readings will most likely be different.
The PWM- is a pulse width modifier. This device is a bit more complicated and I can't claim to know everything about how it works. It basically will get hooked up to the power input of the cell and adjust the frequency of the voltage going in. This helps produce more gas with less amp draw. It also helps keep the cell temperature down. I will need to research more about these as I have not found one that I would purchase yet. They are not required to run, but should be considered later on.
And the test MULE is....

This is my ride right now. 96 saab 900s . a 2.3 liter power house. Right now the four cylinder engine is getting a rough 25-28 mpg avg. In the next week, I will get exact mpg readings and be filling up at the same gas station to keep it as close as possible.
I encourage everyone to research more into this project. Youtube is teaming with great do-it-yourselfers, trying the same thing. I hope to post videos in the future. Try searching "water fuel cell" or "HHO Cell". Also check out "Stan Meyer" who was a pioneer in this technology/science.
Until next time
Friday, May 23, 2008
First Post
I am open and have created this blog to get your opinions and questions. I hope anyone that gets on here and sees what I am doing can give good feedback and learn from my experimentations.
As stated in the summary, I am setting up a HHO generator in my '96 saab 900s in hopes of increasing mileage and efficiency. I have wanted to do this for a few years now, and this summer I will have the time, space, and resources to finally try it out. I know that there are many opinions on the web and media as to whether or not this works BUT I am going to try it for myself to put my and possibly your questions to rest. I will be perfectly honest with my results and most of my equipment.
So to catch up on what I am doing
I have ordered a Hydrogen fuel cell from www.vadaenergy.com . I don't necessarily think that this cell is great quality or will do well. I just needed something to start with and hey, that site is pretty nice and has a competative price. If i think i can build a better cell (Possibly more surface area) I will do that later, but i needed somewhere to start.
The cell has been ordered along with an EFIE from the same company and I am expecting it in the mail in the next few weeks.
The other item I am considering is a PWM (pulse width modifier) to attach before the cell. (any recomendations are welcomed)
Here is a picture of the Cell I purchased

I will post more on the process, dfinitions, and car as I go. Thanks for stopping by